Minky Mukhija, Ajudhia Nath Kalia
ISF College of Pharmacy, Ferozepur Road, Moga, Punjab, India. Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, Punjab, India
Keywords: Antioxidant activity, DPPH assay, NO assay, Zanthoxylum alatum,

In recent years much attention has been devoted to natural antioxidant and their association with health benefits. Plants are the potential source of natural antioxidants. The aim of this study was to assess the antioxidant activity (in vitro) of four extracts from stem bark of Zanthoxylum alatum Roxb. and to determine phenolic content of all extracts. The best antioxidant potential and phenolic content were found in Petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extract. Comparative antioxidant potential was evaluated using DPPH, Nitric Oxide scavenging assay and ferric reducing power assay. Estimation of the total phenolic content was performed using Folin-Ciocalteu’s method. Petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extract gave an IC50 of 85.16±1.05, 72.39±1.53 and 99.25±2.53, 94.81±2.56 for DPPH and Nitric oxide scavenging activities respectively. The petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extracts showed good reducing power with increasing concentration. Both extracts also gave the maximum percentage of phenolic content (equivalent to that of gallic acid) when compared to other extracts. All the antioxidant assays and phenolic content estimation studies revealed that petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extracts were the most promising and significant extract among petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts.

Article Information

Identifiers and Pagination:
First Page:357
Last Page:365
Publisher Id:19204159.6:4.2014
Article History:
Received:June 19, 2014
Accepted:August 02, 2014
Collection year:2014
First Published:October 1, 2014


Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as singlet oxygen, superoxide anion (O2-), hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are generated as byproducts of biological reactions and from exogenous factors [1]. Excess ROS, if not eliminated by antioxidant system, results in high levels of free radicals which causes oxidative stress [2]. Oxidative stress arising from free radicals is the basis of many diseases. Oxidative stress is associated with pathogenic mechanisms of many diseases such as cancer, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, atherosclerosis neurodegenerative diseases and aging processes [3, 4]. It is defined as an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants in favor of the oxidants potentially leading to damage [5]. The curative effects of several medicinal plants are usually due to antioxidant phytochemicals present in it [6].  Halliwell and Gutteridge defined antioxidants as compounds that when present in low concentration in relation to the oxidant prevent or delay the oxidation of the substrate [7]. It has been considered that there is an inverse relationship between dietary intake of antioxidant rich foods and incidence of human diseases [6]. Plants are rich in phenolic substances, usually referred to as polyphenols. Due to its chemical structure, phenolic compounds have the ability of phenoxide ion delocalize. The phenoxide ion can lose a further electron to form the corresponding radical which can also delocalize. In reference to this property, phenolic compounds have radical scavenging and antioxidant activity [8].

Zanthoxylum alatum (ZA) also known as Zanthoxylum armatum belongs to family Rutaceae. It is a perennial shrub or a small tree upto 6 m height with dense glabrous foliage and straight prickles on stem. It is distributed in Himalayas from Kashmir to Bhutan upto 2100 m and in Khasia hills upto 1350 m [9].  ZA is used in traditional medicinal systems for number of disorders like cholera, diabetes, cough, diarrhea, fever, headache, microbial infections, toothache, anti-inflammatory and cancer. The bark of plant is reported to contain a bitter crystalline principal identical with berberine, volatile oil, phenolic compounds and resin [10]. The fruit contains about 1.5% of an essential oil consisting chiefly of 1-a-phellandrene with small amounts of linalool. Leaves yield an essential oil which has a carbonyl compound identified as methyl n-nonyl ketone. The ketone-free fraction contains linalyl acetate, sesquiterpene, hydrocarbon and tricosane. The roots yield the alkaloids dictamnine, magnoflorine, fagarine, skimmianine, xanthoplanine [11, 12]. Carpals of the plant contain xanthoxylin [10]. Various reported pharmacological activities of ZA in different parts are antiproliferative [13], antibacterial, antifungal and anthelmintic [14], anti-inflammatory [15], hepatoprotective [16, 17], larvicidal [18], Antispasmodic, antidiarrhoeal, bronchodialator and in cardiovascular disorders [19]. Antidysentric [20], piscicide [21], lousicidal potential [22], Cytotoxic [23].



The stem bark of ZA was collected from the local areas of Tehri (Garwal), Uttrakhand, India and authenticated from NISCAIR, New Delhi (Ref. NISCAIR/RHMD/Consult/2013/2233/14). Plant drug was shade dried (<40° C), coarsely powdered and stored in air tight container.

Chemicals and reagents

All solvents used were of analytical grade and purchased from Rankem (Deejay Corporation, Jalandhar). 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and L-ascorbic acid, Gallic acid were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (USA). Potassium ferricyanide, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and ferric chloride, Aluminium chloride, potassium acetate were purchased from CDH, New Delhi. Sulphanilic acid and napthylelene diamine dichloride were purchased from Rankem, New Delhi. Folin Ciocalteu’s reagent were procured from E-merck (India) Ltd, Mumbai.

Extraction of plant material

Successive solvent extraction scheme was used for the preparation of different extracts. The stem bark was crushed to coarse powder and extracted with Petroleum ether (40-60ºC) using Soxhlet’s apparatus for 3 days. The extract was filtered through Whatmann filter paper and concentrated with rota-evaporator and transferred to a pre-weighed china dish and dried in a vacuum dessicator. The marc obtained was then air-dried and used for further extraction with chloroform followed by ethyl acetate and methanol. The dried extracts were placed in desiccators for further studies.

Phytochemical screening

Petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts were subjected to phytochemical analysis for checking the presence of carbohydrates, alkaloids, glycosides, proteins, saponins, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, steroids and triterpenoids, etc. [24].

In vitro antioxidant studies

All the extracts were tested for their free radical scavenging property using different in vitro models. All experiments were performed thrice and their results averaged. L-Ascorbic acid was used as standard control in each experiment. Results were expressed in IC50 values.

DPPH radical scavenging activity [25]

DPPH radical scavenging activity was performed according to the method of Blois, 1958 with some modifications. The 0.1 mM solution of DPPH in methanol (22.2 mg in 1000 ml) was freshly prepared. Different concentrations of extract and standards (25-400 µg/ml) were added at an equal volume to methanolic solution of DPPH. After 30 min at room temperature, the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. Radical scavenging activity was calculated by the following formula (formula 1) 

% inhibition = Acontrol –Atest/ Acontrol × 100

where, Acontrol = Absorbance of control reaction and Atest =  Absorbance of samples of extracts.

Nitric oxide radical scavenging activity [26]

Nitric oxide radical scavenging activity was performed according to the method of Garrat, 1964 with some modifications. 2 ml of 10 mM sodium nitroprusside in 0.5 ml phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) was mixed with 0.5 ml of extract at various concentrations (25-400 µg/ml) and the mixture was incubated at 25°C for 150 min From the incubated mixture 0.5 ml was taken out and added into 1.0 ml sulfanilic acid reagent (33% in 20% glacial acetic acid) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. finally, 1.0 ml naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride (0.1% w/v) was mixed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min before measuring the absorbance at 540 nm. The nitric oxide radicals scavenging activity was calculated by the formula 1.

Reducing power assay [27]

Reducing power assay was performed according to the method of Oyaizu, 1986 with some modifications. The extract (0.75 ml) at various concentrations (25-400 µg/ml) was mixed with 0.75 ml of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 0.75 ml of potassium ferricyanide (1%, w/v) followed by incubating at 50°C in a water bath for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.75 ml of trichloracetic acid (TCA) solution (10%) and then centrifuged at 3000 r/min for 10 min. 1.5 ml of the supernatant was mixed with 1.5 ml of distilled water and 0.1 ml of ferric chloride (FeCl3) solution (0.1% w/v) for 10 min. The absorbance at 700 nm was measured as the reducing power. Higher absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated greater reducing power.

Estimation of total phenolic content

Gallic acid standard solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg in 10 ml water to make 1 mg/ml solution. The total concentration of phenolic compounds in the extracts was determined using a series of gallic acid standard solutions (20-100 µg/ml) as described by Singleton and Rossi, 1965) but with some modifications. The extract (10 mg) was dissolved in 10 ml of water to prepare 1mg/ml solution of extract. Each extract solution (0.1 ml) was mixed with 2 ml of a 2% (w/v) sodium carbonate solution and vortexed vigorously. The same procedure was also applied to the standard solutions of gallic acid. After 3 min, 0.1 ml of 50% Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent was added and each mixture was vortexed again. The absorbance at 760 nm of each mixture was measured after incubation for 30 min at room temperature and the concentration of the sample solution was determined from the calibration curve. Results were expressed as milligrams of total phenolics content per grams of extract as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) [28].


                Total phenolic contents (%) = GAE x V x D x 10-6 x 100/W

            Where, GAE - Gallic acid equivalent (µg/ml), V - Total volume of sample (ml),                                            D - Dilution factor, W - Sample weight (g)                                                                     - 

Statistical analysis

All analysis was done in triplicate and results are expressed as mean ± S.D. IC50 values were determined by interpolations.


Phytochemical screening

Phytochemical screening of different plant extracts are shown in Table 1

Table 1: Phytochemical screening of different plant extracts

+ indicates presence, - indicates absence

Antioxidant activity

In present study we have evaluated the antioxidant activity of different extracts of Zanthoxylum alatum stem bark. Various concentrations of extracts ranging from (25-400 µg/ml) were tested for their antioxidant activity in different in vitro models.

Among all the extracts tested for in vitro antioxidant activity using DPPH, nitric oxide radical scavenging activity and reducing power assay; petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extract has shown maximum antioxidant activity with IC50 values of 85.16±1.05 and 99.25±2.53 in DPPH assay and 72.39±1.53 and 94.81±2.56 in Nitric oxide radical scavenging assay (Table 2). The antioxidant activity increased with increasing concentration in all the models. The percentage inhibition of standard and extracts in various models DPPH and nitric oxide scavenging assay as shown in Figure 1 & 2. Reducing power of extracts was concentration dependent. Petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extract has maximum reducing power amongst other plant extracts as observed in Table 3. Higher absorbance indicates more reducing power.

Figure 1: DPPH radical scavenging effect of Ascorbic acid and various extracts of ZA stem Bark

Figure 2: Nitric oxide scavenging activity of Ascorbic acid and various extracts of ZA stem Bark

Total phenolic estimation

The standard ascorbic acid and extracts were determined for its total phenolic content on the basis of its gallic acid equivalent Folin-Ciocalteu phenol assay. The amount of gallic acid equivalent was determined from the calculation of calibration curve of gallic acid (Figure 3). The maximum phenolic content was found in petroleum ether extract and ethyl acetate extract (5.12% and 4.36 mg/g GAE resp.). The results are reported in Table 4.

Thus the above results exhibited that the petroleum ether extract is the most active whereas the chloroform extract is the lowest one.

Table 3:  Reductive ability of Standard and various extracts of ZA stem Bark


Natural antioxidants that are present in plants are responsible for inhibiting or preventing the harmful consequences of oxidative stress. Plants contains free radical scavengers like polyphenols, flavonoids and phenolic compounds [29]. These compounds have shown to have antioxidant activity. In the present paper, we have evaluated the free radical scavenger activity of different extracts of Zanthoxylum alatum stem bark.

There are number of assay designed to measure overall antioxidant activity/reducing potential, as an indication of total capacity of plants to withstand free radical stress [30].

DPPH is very convenient for the screening of number of samples of different polarity. The measurement of the scavenging of DPPH radical allows to determine the intrinsic ability of substance to donate hydrogen atom or electrons to this reactive species in a homogenous system. Methanolic DPPH solution get reduced because of the presence of antioxidant substances having hydrogen-donating groups such as phenols and flavonoid compounds due to the formation of non radical DPPH-H form [31].

Nitric oxide is a diffusible free radical that plays an important role as an effectors molecule in diverse biological systems including neuronal messenger, vasodilatation and antitumor activities [32]. Although, NO is involved in host defence, over production of these radical contributes to the pathogenesis of various diseases [33]. The petroleum ether extract and ethyl acetate extract significantly inhibited NO in a dose dependent manner with the IC50 being 72.39±1.53 and 94.81±2.56 µg/ml as compared with the standards ascorbic acid having the IC50 values of 42.8±2.61 µg/ml. The results indicated that both petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extract contain the compounds which are able to inhibit NO and act as an antioxidant.

Fe (III) reduction is often used as an indicator of electron-donating activity, which is an important mechanism of phenolic antioxidant action [34]. In the reducing power assay, the presence of antioxidants in the samples would result in the reducing of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by donating an electron [35]. Being good electron donors, phenolic compounds shows the reducing power and have ability to convert ferric ion to ferrous ion by donating an electron (20). Increasing absorbance at 700 nm indicates an increase in reductive ability [36].

In our study, the different extracts of ZA showed high total antioxidant and DPPH activity, NO and ferrous iron reducing capacities. Considerable correlations were observed between DPPH and NO scavenging, reducing power and total phenols. Antioxidant capacity may be associated with a high phenol content as Mansouri et al. 2005 reported that most of the antioxidant activity of plants is derived from phenols [37]. Structurally, phenols comprise an aromatic ring having one or more hydroxyl groups. The antioxidant activity of this type of molecule is due to their ability to scavenge free radicals, donate hydrogen atoms or electrons or chelate metal cations [38]. Previously stem bark of ZA has been reported to contain phenolic compounds [39].

In the present study, the antioxidant activity of petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extracts may be attributed to the combined effects of the phenolic compounds and the results are in full agreement with previous studies on other plants [40, 41].


Amongst all the extracts, petroleum ether and ethyl acetate extracts of ZA showed potent antioxidant potential as determined by different procedures. Presence of phenolic compounds in the extracts confirmed their utility as potent antioxidant agent.


We express our sincere thanks to Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala for allowing us to proceed with the research proposal. We also express our thanks to the Management and Shri. Parveen Garg, Honorable Chairman, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga (Punjab) for providing necessary facilities.


1.       Wiseman, H. and Halliwell, B. (1996). Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochemical Journal 313(1):17-29.

2.       Sreeramulu, D., Reddy, C.V.K., Chauhan, A., Balakrishna, N. and Raghunath, M. (2013). Natural Antioxidant Activity of Commonly Consumed Plant Foods in India: Effect of Domestic Processing. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity Article ID 369479, 12 pages.

3.       Reuter, S., Gupta, S.C, Chaturvedi, M.M. and Aggarwal, B.B. (2010). Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Cancer: How are They Linked? Free Radical Biology & Medicine 49(11): 1603-1616.

4.       Duracková, Z. Some Current Insights into Oxidative Stress. (2010). Physiological Research 59(4):459-469.

5.       Katalinic, V., Milos, M., Kulisic, T. and Jukic, M. (2006). Screening of 70 medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenols. Food Chemistry 94:550–557.

6.       Yildrim,  A.,  Oktay,  M. and Bilaloglu,  V. (2001).  The  antioxidant  activity  of leaves of Cydonia  vulgaris. Turkish Journal of Medical Science 31:23-27.

7.       Halliwell, B. and Guteridge, J.M.C. (1989). Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 1-20.

8.       Waterman P.G., and Mole, S. (1994). Analysis of Phenolic Plant Metabolites. Blackwell Cientific Publications, UK. pp. 85-87.

9.       Gupta, A.K., Tandon, N. and Sharma, M. (2006). Zanthoxylum armatum. In: Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal Plants Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). Indraprasthra press, New Delhi. pp. 271-278.

10.    Nadkarni, A.M. (2002). Indian Material Medica. Vol. 1. Bombay Popular Prakashan, Mumbai. pp. 1302.

11.    Kapoor, L.D. (1990). Handbook of Ayurvedic medicinal plants. 1st ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp. 416.

12.    Baquar, S.R.. (1989). Medicinal and poisonous plants of Pakistan, 1st ed. Printas, Karachi, Pakistan. pp. 508.

13.    Kumar, S. and Muller, K. (1999). Inhibition of keratinocyte growth by different Nepalese Zanthoxylum species. Phytotherapy Research 13:214-217.

14.    Mehta, M.B., Kharya, M.D., Srivastava, R. and Verma, K.C. (1981). Antimicrobial and anthelmintic activities of the essential oil of Zanthoxylum alatum Roxb. Indian Perfumary 25:19-21.

15.    Bhatt, N. and Upadhyaya, K. (2010). Anti inflammatory activity of ethanolic extract of bark of Zanthoxylum armatum D.C. Pharmacology Online 2:123-132.

16.    Ranawat, L., Bhatt, J. and Patel, J. (2010). Hepatoprotective activity of ethanolic extracts of bark of Zanthoxylum armatum DC in CCl4 induced hepatic damage in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 127:777-780.

17.    Verma, N. and Khosa, R.L. (2010). Hepatoprotective activity of leaves of Zanthoxylum armatum DC in CCl4 produced hepatotoxicity in rats. Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics 47:124-127.

18.    Tiwary, M., Naika, S.N., Tewary, D.K., Mittal, P.K. and Yadav, S. (2007). Chemical composition and larvicidal activities of the essential oil of Zanthoxylum armatum DC (Rutaceae) against three mosquito vectors. Journal of Vector Borne Disease 44:198-204.

19.    Gilani, S.N., Khan, A.U. and Gilani, A.H. (2010). Pharmacological basis for the medicinal use of Zanthoxylum armatum in gut, airways and cardiovascular disorders. Phytotherapy Research 24:553-558.

20.    Kar, A. and Borthakur, S.K. (2008). Medicinal plants used against dysentery, diarrhea and cholera by the tribes of erstwhile Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh. Natural Product Radiance 7:176-181.

21.    Ramanujam, S.N. and Ratha, B.K. (2008). Effect of alcohol extract of a natural piscicide fruits of Zanthoxylum armatum DC on Mg2+- and Na+, K+ -ATPase activity in various tissues of a freshwater air-breathing fish, Heteropneustes fossilis. Aquaculture 283:77

22.    Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Ghildiyal, J.C., Baslas, R.K. and Saxena, A.K. (2003). The lousicidal potential of the seed extract of Zanthoxylum alatum. Indian Veternary Journal 80:848-850.

23.    Barkatullah, I.M. and Muhammad, N. (2011). Evaluation of Zanthoxylum armatum DC for in-vitro and in-vivo pharmacological screening. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 5:1718-1723.

24.    Harborne, J.B. (1998).  Phytochemical methods.  3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 19-134.

25.    Blois MS. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 29:1199-2000.

26.    Garrat DC. (1964). The Quantitative Analysis of Drugs. Chapman and Hall. pp. 456.

27.    Oyaizu, M. (1986). Studies on products on browning reaction prepared from glucose amine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition 44:307-315.

28.    Singleton, V.L. and Rossi, J.A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology Viticulture 16:144-158.

29.    Khalaf, N.A., Shakya. A.K., Al-Othman, A, El-Agbar, Z. and Farah, H. (2008) Antioxidant Activity of Some Common Plants. Turkish Journal of Biology 32:51-55.

30.    Lugasi, A., Horvahovich, P. and Dworschak, E. (1999). Additional Information to the in vitro Antioxidant Activity of Ginkgo biloba L. Phytotherapy Research 13(2):160-162.

31.    Mensour, L.L., Menezes,  F.S.,  Leitao, G.G., Reis A.S, Dos Santos, T.C. and Coube, C.S. (2011). Screening of Brazilian Plant Extracts for Antioxidant Activity  by  Use  of  DPPH  Free  Radical  Method.  Phytotherapy Research 15:127-130.

32.    Hagerman, A.E., Riedel, K.M., Jones, G.A., Sovik, K.N. Ritchard, N.T. Hartzfeld P.W. Riechel, T.L., (1998): High molecular weight plant polyphenolics (tannins) as biological antioxidants. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 46: 1887-92.

33.    Guo, L., Fatig, R.O., Orr, G.L., Schafer, B.W., Strickland, J.A. and Sukhapinda, K. (1999). Photorhabdus luminescens W-14 insecticidal activity consists of at least two similar but distinct proteins. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 274:9836-9842.

34.    Nabavi, S.M., Ebrahimzadeh, M.A., Nabavi, S.F., Fazelian, M. and Eslami, B. (2009). In vitro antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of Diospyros lotus and Pyrus boissieriana growing in Iran. Pharmacognosy Magazine 4(18):123-127.

35.    Ebrahimzadeh, M.A., Nabavi, S.M., Nabavi, S.F., Bahramian, F. and Bekhradnia, A.R. (2010). Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of H. officinalis, Var. angustifolius, V. odorata, B. hyrcana and C. speciosum. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 23(1):29-34.

36.    Sravani, T. and Paarakh, P.M. (2012). Antioxidant activity of Hedychium spicatum Buch.-Ham. Rhizomes. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources 3(3):354-58.

37.    Mansouri, A., Embared, G., Kokkalou, E. and Kefalas, P. (2005). Phenolic  profile  and  antioxidant  activity  of  the  Algerian  ripe date  palm  fruit  (Phoenix  dactylifera). Food Chemistry. 89:411-420.

38.    Amarowicz, R., Pegg, R.B., Rahimi, M., Barl, B. and Weil, J.A. (2004). Free radical  scavenging  capacity  and  antioxidant  activity  of  selected plant  species  from  the  Canadian  prairies,  Food  Chemistry. 84:551–562.

39.    Mukhija, M., Dhar, K.L. and Kalia, A.N. (2014). Bioactive Lignans from Zanthoxylum alatum Roxb. stem bark with cytotoxic potential. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 152:106-112.

40.    Mazandarani, M., Moghaddam, Z., Zolfaghari, M.R., Ghaemi, E.A. and Bayat, H. (2012). Effects of Solvent Type on Phenolics and Flavonoids Content and Antioxidant Activities in Onosma dichroanthum Boiss. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 6:4481-4488.

41. Kukic, J., Petrovic, S. and Niketic, M. (2006). Antioxidant activity of four endemic Stachys taxa. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 29(4):725-729.

© 2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits
Editor in Chief
Prof. Dr. Cornelia M. Keck (Philipps-Universität Marburg)
Marburg, Germany


Welcome to the research group of Prof. Dr. Cornelia M. Keck in Marburg. Cornelia M. Keck is a pharmacist and obtained her PhD in 2006 from the Freie Universität (FU) in Berlin. In 2009 she was appointed as Adjunct Professor for Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Nanotechnology at the University Putra Malaysia (UPM) and in 2011 she obtained her Venia legendi (Habilitation) at the Freie Universität Berlin and was appointed as a Professor for Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics at the University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern. Since 2016 she is Professor of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics at the Philipps-Universität Marburg. Her field of research is the development and characterization of innovative nanocarriers for improved delivery of poorly soluble actives for healthcare and cosmetics. Prof. Keck is executive board member of the German Association of Nanotechnology (Deutscher Verband Nanotechnologie), Vize-chairman of the unit „Dermocosmetics“ at the German Society of Dermopharmacy, active member in many pharmaceutical societies and member of the BfR Committee for Cosmetics at the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR).

Journal Highlights
Abbreviation: J App Pharm
Frequency: Annual 
Current Volume: 9 (2017)
Next scheduled volume: December, 2018 (Volume 10)
Back volumes: 1-9
Starting year: 2009
Nature: Online 
Submission: Online  
Language: English

Subject & Scope
  • Pharmaceutics
  • Physical Pharmacy 
  • Dosage Forms Science 
  • Pharmaceutical Microbiology & Immunology 
  • Industrial Pharmacy 
  • Bio-Pharmaceutics 
  • Pharmaceutical Chemistry 
  • Pharmaceutical Instrumentation 
  • Medicinal Chemistry 
  • Pharmacognosy 
  • Physiology &Histology 
  • Anatomy & Pathology 
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics 
  • Pharmacy Practice 
  • Pharmaceutical Mathematics   
  • Biostatistics 
  • Dispensing 
  • Community Social & Administrative Pharmacy 
  • Hospital Pharmacy 
  • Clinical Pharmacy 
  • Pharmaceutical Quality Management 
  • Forensic Pharmacy 
  • Pharmaceutical Technology 
  • Pharmaceutical Management & Marketing

Consortium Publisher is an online publisher that enjoys global presence with International Journals

Follow Us

©2009 - 2019 Consortium Publisher Canada

Contact Info

6252 Lisgar Dr Mississauga Ontario L5N7V2 Canada
+1 (647) 526-0885